-
Boyd Carter wrote a new post
-
Quoting again from the article:
““The independent state legislature argument hinges on language in the Constitution that says election rules ‘shall be prescribed in each state by the legislature thereof,’” NBC News reported. “Supporters of the theory, which has never been endorsed by the Supreme Court, say the language supports the notion that, when it comes to federal election rules, legislatures have ultimate power under state law, potentially irrespective of potential constraints imposed by state constitutions.””
-
Quoting again from the article;
“NBC added in its report: “The independent state legislature theory has been embraced by supporters of former President Donald Trump, who cited it in various cases during the 2020 presidential election and its aftermath. The case, which could have a broad impact on an array of election issues, is being closely watched for its potential impact on the 2024 presidential election.””
-
Quoting again from the article;
“In an earlier interview with the Examiner, Jason Snead of the Honest Elections Project warned that if the theory were to be rejected, it may “leave the door wide open to the Left’s anti-democracy campaign, which has saturated the courts with politicized lawsuits and introduced chaos to our elections.””
-
Boyd Carter wrote a new post
-
quoting from the article:
“TGP reported on fresh footage that shows employees of Maricopa County reconfiguring voting machines on October 14th, 17th, and 18th, after their statutory testing for Logic and Accuracy, so that 59% of them would fail when Republican voters came in to vote on Election Day in 2022.”
-
Quoting again from the article:
“The newly reprogrammed voting machines are shown in the video to be jamming on October 14th, just like they did on Election Day. This can be observed as personnel test the machines. Despite the absence of any public warning, oversight, or media presence, the County continues to insist that these tests were not conducted in private. Additionally, they assert that it was not a “testing.”
Kari Lake has now stated that they have more footage similar to the video that was previously referenced.”
-
Quoting again from the article;
““They didn’t count on the fact that our side, the good guys, were actually recording this 24-hour footage to be used later, as in right now,” said Kari.
Kari Lake has every intention of appealing the ridiculous verdict. During a recent press conference, Lake declared that she intends to “continue pushing our case to the United States Supreme Court.””
-
-
Boyd Carter wrote a new post
-
Quoting again from the article:
“In February 2021, Biden made America officially rejoin the Paris Climate Agreement, which IER points out is “detrimental to Americans while propping up oil production in Russia and OPEC and increasing the dependence of Europe on Russian oil and natural gas.” It also benefits China, which “dominates the supply chain for critical minerals that are needed for wind turbines, solar panels, and electric vehicle batteries.””
-
Quoting again from the article:
“In April 2021, Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland revoked policies in Secretarial Order 3398 set by the Trump administration, thereby rejecting “American energy independence” as a goal, rejecting an “America-first offshore energy strategy,” and doing away with setting up an “executive committee for expedited permitting.”
“These actions set the stage for the unprecedented slowdown in energy activity by the Interior Department, steward of 2.46 billion acres of federal mineral estate and all its energy and mineral resources,” IER said.”
-
Boyd Carter wrote a new post
-
Quoting from the article:
“Representative Tim Burchett, a Tennessee Republican and member of the House Oversight Committee, claimed in April that material provided by an IRS whistleblower requesting protection to testify might lead to Biden’s impeachment.
“This is just the very tip of the iceberg. This very brave IRS agent coming forward, I think, will just start it,” he told Fox News reporter Maria Bartiromo, “They’re talking about impeaching Biden. How could we not impeach Biden if this does, in fact, reach him?”:
-
Quoting again from the article:
“The speaker also discussed the letter, which was signed by 51 former intelligence chiefs, in which they claimed that the laptop used by Hunter Bien bore the telltale signs of Russian disinformation.
But according to testimony given to the House Judiciary Committee by former acting CIA director Michael Morell, he sent the letter subsequent to conversing with Antony Blinken, the current secretary of state, because his goal was for Joe Biden to win the 2020 presidential election.:”
-
-
Boyd Carter wrote a new post
-
Quoting again from the article:
““Those individuals have to be terrified that a Republican president comes in with a Republican Attorney General, investigates them, and charges them with all of the crimes they have committed over the last eight years.”
“Take it to the bank. They will absolutely interfere in 2024,” McFarland reiterated. “I’m not sure how, but they absolutely will interfere, not only because they’re not going to like whoever the Republican candidate is, but because they have to protect their own hides.””
-
Quoting again from the article:
“The mainstream media has refused to cover the Durham report’s findings that the FBI and DOJ collaborated with the Clinton campaign to frame Donald Trump for treason during the 2016.
But despite the news blackout, the majority of Americans are deeply concerned about the intelligence community’s interference in the 2016 and 2020 elections.”
-
Boyd Carter wrote a new post
-
Quoting from the article:
“In the majority opinion, along with Justice Sotomayor and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, conservative Justice Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett joined liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. In that decision, Justice Sotomayor stated that Justice Kagan had engaged in “sleight of hand” and made “a false equivalence between AWF’s commercial licensing and Warhol’s original creation.” “The result is a series of misstatements and exaggerations, from the dissent’s very first sentence to its very last,” she added.”
-
Quoting again from the article:
“The sarcastic asides caught the attention of court reporters and legal experts. “Interesting to see how heated the disagreement between Sotomayor and Kagan is,” Ed Whelan, the distinguished senior fellow and Antonin Scalia chair in constitutional studies at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, wrote on Twitter. “I’m not sure how one would quantify this, but it’d be interesting if someone could figure out whether SCOTUS opinions are less collegial now than before. Today’s Sotomayor/Kagan clash really stood out on that front,” Matt Ford, who covers law and the courts for the New Republic, said in a tweet.
-
-
Boyd Carter wrote a new post
-
Quoting from the article:
“The FBI did not confirm and was unable to confirm any of the major accusations made in the notorious Steele dossier regarding then-candidate Donald Trump.
FBI Was Never Fair. As said, some of the Steele reports were not given to the Crossfire Hurricane investigators before mid-September.”
-
Boyd Carter wrote a new post
-
Boyd Carter wrote a new post
-
Quoting again from the article:
“Blehm continued with this line of questioning Thursday asking Valenzuela, “Is it physically possible [now] for Maricopa County employees to log in and conduct signature verification from home?”
The elections director responded, “An employee can log in and access their PC as if they were sitting in front of that PC remote, that are assigned those work stations,” but indicating that is not protocol.”
-
Quoting again from the article:
“Approximately 80 percent of Arizonans vote using mail-in ballots, according to the Citizens Clean Elections Commission.
Lake’s attorney Kurt Olsen has argued that the process for verifying voters in Maricopa County is systemically flawed.
On Wednesday, he told that court that a review of data from the county showed at least 334,000 mail-in ballots were in effect not verified, which is far in excess of Hobbs’ 17,000 vote margin of victory.”
-
Boyd Carter wrote a new post
-
Quoting from the article:
“History is replete with political/cultural movements. For example The Renaissance during the 15th and 16th Centuries. Now, fast forward to today and we are eyewitnesses to a massive out-migration from California due, in large measure to the Marxism that has infected California’s politics since the 1960s. Recall, however, in earlier times, California’s politics were guided by the Conservatism of the Hispanics who held land grants from the Spanish Conquistadores, and were guided by the Conservatism of the high-born Mexicans who followed in the footprints of the Conquistadores.”
-
Quoting again from the article:
“Unfortunately for California’s Middle Class of today, the turmoil of the 1960s began a slow but steady seismic shift from Conservatism downward into sanctuary-welfare-state Marxism. When Ronald Reagan left for Washington in November 1980, the last vestige of Conservatism left with him.
Consequently, California’s once-comfortable Middle Class can no longer afford high taxes on their homes, auto gas, electricity, natural gas, and groceries. The Golden State is left with the rich in Silicon Valley and Hollywood and the poor in the agricultural water-starved Inland Empire between the Coastal Ranges and the Arizona and Nevada deserts. Consequently, between 2007 and 2016, California lost over one million residents to Texas, Nevada, Arizona and other lower-tax states.”
-
Quoting again from the article:
“Inexplicably, some of the fleeing Californians bring their socialist politics into other states, such as Colorado, and that begins the Californication thereof, sending property and other tax rates to unaffordable levels, prompting another wave of out-migration to states like Florida and Texas.”
-
- Load More Posts
User Balance
21,175
/
MAGA Points
Senator
Friends
Until33 GrannyAm
@grannyam
Tammy
@mars1of12yahoo-com
STripped
@strippe
Ultra MAGA Lori S
@deplorablelori
DasMeatster
@dasmeatster
Dana17
@dana17
CAROL
@caj1
FJB
@fjb
HOWARD ALEXANDER STAFFORD
@staffordfarms
Earl Glynn
@earl
Quoting from the article:
“According to The Washington Examiner:
“Moore v. Harper features a dispute over North Carolina’s Supreme Court dismissing a GOP-backed apportionment plan for being too partisan.
Republicans filed a challenge to the high court, but then conservatives managed to regain control of the state Supreme Court. The now-5-2 Republican-majority court subsequently opted to rehear the redistricting case. The court scraped its prior ruling late last month, which was the underpinning of the Moore v. Harper case pending before the Supreme Court.”