No matter how it is ruled, the U.S. Supreme Court is debating a significant election case that will have a significant impact on the 2024 election.

The “independent state legislature theory” is a constitutional idea that is the center of the North Carolina case. Supporters contend that state legislatures have a significant amount of power to oversee the conduct of federal elections in their individual jurisdictions with little interference from state courts or governors.

The Moore v. Harper case, which particularly addresses the theory, is now being debated by the supreme court. There are worries that the court might not resolve the issue completely in time for the forthcoming 2024 elections.

Kari Lake appeared on Bannon’s War Room Tuesday morning to provide a significant update on her election lawsuit and the newly revealed proof that her election was rigged by corrupt Maricopa County officials. Kari Lake is alleging that her election was stolen by a group of individuals working for Maricopa County.

Kari Lake’s fight against the stolen Arizona Midterm election and her recent trial on signature verification fraud after the claim was remanded by the Arizona Supreme Court has received substantial coverage.

Judge Peter A. Thompson once again ruled in favor of the defendants, this time declaring that “level one and level two signature review did take place in some fashion.” This was despite the fact that there was enormous evidence of fraud in the Midterm Election and phony signature verification.

TGP recently reported on newly available records that show Maricopa County conducted “secret” Logic and Accuracy testing on October 14th, following the statutorily mandated test on October 11th, and that the legally needed public notice was not given. These data show that the public notice was not issued because it was legally required.

In the case of Kari Lake’s allegedly rigged election, this is the smoking gun. According to the assessment of Lake attorney Kurt Olsen, “this evidence would support our allegation that this election was rigged.”

Kari Lake appeared on Bannon’s War Room Tuesday morning to provide a significant update on her election lawsuit and the newly revealed proof that her election was rigged by corrupt Maricopa County officials. Kari Lake is alleging that her election was stolen by a group of individuals working for Maricopa County.

Kari Lake’s fight against the stolen Arizona Midterm election and her recent trial on signature verification fraud after the claim was remanded by the Arizona Supreme Court has received substantial coverage.

Judge Peter A. Thompson once again ruled in favor of the defendants, this time declaring that “level one and level two signature review did take place in some fashion.” This was despite the fact that there was enormous evidence of fraud in the Midterm Election and phony signature verification.

TGP recently reported on newly available records that show Maricopa County conducted “secret” Logic and Accuracy testing on October 14th, following the statutorily mandated test on October 11th, and that the legally needed public notice was not given. These data show that the public notice was not issued because it was legally required.

In the case of Kari Lake’s allegedly rigged election, this is the smoking gun. According to the assessment of Lake attorney Kurt Olsen, “this evidence would support our allegation that this election was rigged.”

The Biden administration has implemented multiple policies that have harmed America’s domestic energy production and weakened the country’s standing internationally leading to gas shortages and the highest-ever prices in the nation’s history.

“President Biden and the Democrats in Congress have a plan for American energy: make it harder to produce and more expensive to purchase. Since Mr. Biden took office, his administration and its allies have taken over 150 actions deliberately designed to make it harder to produce energy here in America,” according to a May 23 Institute for Energy Research (IER) report.

Immediately after becoming president, Biden implemented a series of measures aimed at limiting fossil fuel use. This included canceling the Keystone XL pipeline, issuing a moratorium on all oil and natural gas leasing activities in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, and revoking Trump-era orders that decreased regulations on federal land while expanding the ability to produce energy domestically.

Biden implemented measures that artificially raised the regulatory costs of fossil fuel energy production. He also issued an executive order announcing a moratorium on new oil and gas leases on public lands or in offshore waters as well as reconsideration of federal oil and gas permitting and leasing practices.

The president then signed an executive order that directed agencies to eliminate federal fossil fuel subsidies wherever possible, thus putting oil and gas firms at a disadvantage compared to other energy sources that received direct subsidies. All this was done in just the first ten days in office.

Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, has addressed the topic of the growing number of Republicans who are calling for the impeachment of President Joe Biden and other officials of his administration.

James Comer, the Kentucky Republican who chairs the House Oversight Committee, reportedly tried to get FBI documents earlier this month, according to Punchbowl News. Comer said his belief that the records may be able to offer light on claims that while Vice President, Biden may have accepted payments from a foreign official in exchange for using his influence over policy decisions while serving in the Obama administration.

Comer’s claim is supported by evidence that was given to him by an unnamed whistleblower; three FBI informants appeared before the Judiciary Committee on Thursday.

However, Jordan stated that the party’s effort to impeach is now working “to get the facts” amid rising clamor for it.

“You think about [Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro] Mayorkas, he certainly warrants impeachment, but that’s a decision we have to make as a conference…he said to Punchbowl News in the beginning of May, as reported by Newsweek, “And relative to the president, of course, that’s a decision that’s going to be made by the full Republican Conference and the speaker, and no one’s really focused on that now.”

Former National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland warned that the intelligence agencies and the Justice Department rigged the 2016 and 2020 elections and are fixing to interfere in the 2024 election.

McFarland, a President Donald Trump nominee, explained that the intelligence community won’t be able to resist rigging the 2024 election after seeing how it got away with interfering in the last two elections.

“We now have black-and-white evidence that the FBI interfered in the 2016 election. When they failed to get Hillary Clinton elected, they set out to destroy the Trump administration,” she said Monday on Fox Business, referring to the recently released Durham Report.

“Go back to 2020. It was the CIA this who got involved in the 2020 election with those 51 former intel agents who said the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation,” she said.

“So they’ve gotten away with it for two elections. They will surely try and get away with it in 2024, right? Because there are no consequences…”

McFarland pointed out that these same perpetrators also have an existential stake in rigging the 2024 election because they fear a Republican president could hold them accountable for their treason.

Elena Kagan, a justice on the Supreme Court, appeared to take exception to Sonia Sotomayor’s majority opinion in a copyright case involving Andy Warhol and Prince. In her dissenting opinion, Kagan told readers that she would trust their “good judgment” rather than counter her colleague’s “fistfuls of comeback footnotes.”

The jab at Kagan’s fellow liberal was delivered in a lengthy second footnote of her dissent, which some observers of the Supreme Court deemed to be “interesting” and “noteworthy.”

“One preliminary note before beginning in earnest,” Kagan wrote. “As readers are by now aware, the majority opinion is trained on this dissent in a way majority opinions seldom are. Maybe that makes the majority opinion self-refuting? After all, a dissent with ‘no theory’ and ‘[n]o reason’ is not one usually thought to merit pages of commentary and fistfuls of comeback footnotes.”

“In any event,” Kagan went on. “I’ll not attempt to rebut point for point the majority’s varied accusations; instead, I’ll mainly rest on my original submission. I’ll just make two suggestions about reading what follows,” she concluded. “First, when you see that my description of a precedent differs from the majority’s, go take a look at the decision. Second, when you come across an argument that you recall the majority took issue with, go back to its response and ask yourself about the ratio of reasoning to [statements without evidence]. With those two recommendations, I’ll take my chances on readers’ good judgment.”

After the election of 2016, Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff repeatedly spoke to the press and argued on the House floor that there was proof of collaboration or conspiracy in plain sight, involving the Trump campaign and Russia. This untrue assertion was first put forth and supported by failed presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton.

After the publication of special counsel John Durham’s report, Schiff’s utterly refuted assertions suddenly seem to be substantially more damaging.

Jonathan Turley, a legal expert and professor at the George Washington University Law School, urged Schiff to explain his alleged falsehoods.

source Tired of censorship from other social media platforms? Join us on Free Talk, OANs new social platform.  Users can post, chat and connect with other members. It allows Free Speech at home, on the go and anywhere in the world, No SHADOWBANNING! Every post on this site was created […] More

aricopa County Elections Director Reynaldo Valenzuela testified at Republican Kari Lake’s election challenge trial Wednesday that mail-in ballot reviews were done at election officials’ homes in 2020 with no observers present.

Valenzuela also confirmed officials still have the ability to do so now.

Lake is contesting Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs’ win last November by approximately 17,000 votes, or 0.7 percent of the more than 2.5 million ballots cast statewide.

In March, the Arizona Supreme Court remanded the issue of whether the mail-in ballot legally mandated signature verification process was followed in Maricopa County during the election back to the trial court.

Lake attorney Byran Blehm questioned Valenzuela regarding the places where mail-in ballot verification took place in November and whether independent observers were present.

Valenzuela said there were three locations where mail-in verification took place: Maricopa County Tabulation and Election Center, known as MCTEC in downtown Phoenix; the Maricopa County Recorder’s office, also in Phoenix; and Maricopa County’s Southeast Regional Center in Mesa.

Whistleblower Jacqueline Onigkeit, who worked as a ballot reviewer at MCTEC in November, had testified before Valenzuela that she thought it was “odd” when she and her fellow reviewers were sent home at 7 p.m. as counting continued of mail-in ballots.

“Why did you think it was odd?” Lake attorney Kurt Olsen asked.

“Well, because we had observers that were constantly watching what we were doing [at the designated vote-counting area]. But there was, I’m assuming, no observers there [at the recorder’s office] who was watching what they were doing,” she replied.

In light of this testimony, Blehm questioned Valenzuela whether observers are allowed in the county recorder’s office or at the Mesa location.

Valenzuela responded that observers are allowed in “any general area,” but it’s not a legal requirement.

He went on to explain that as a “certified election officer” he and others can do signature verification in their offices with no observers present.

History is replete with political/cultural movements. For example The Renaissance during the 15th and 16th Centuries. Now, fast forward to today and we