Academics and the grid Part I: I don’t think that study means what you think it means – Watts Up With That? (wattsupwiththat.com)

Recognizing the difference between what theory suggests and practical knowledge demonstrates is critical.

Report

Senator

Posted by Boyd Carter

RANK: Senator

UPVote if you like this

54 Points
Upvote

One Comment

  1. Quoting from the article:

    “There’s been a lot of discussion about the differences between scientists and engineers. The boundaries can get blurry and often are non-existent. In the energy power system arena, perhaps to my past professor’s chagrin, I’m afraid the more important boundary might be between academics and practicing engineers. Academics can approach the grid with some detachment while practicing engineers must keep it running 24/7/365. Practicing engineers have skin in the game and typically face consequences for errors and shortcomings, while academics and unfortunately many policy makers are more insulated. This brings to mind Thomas Sowell’s guidance, “It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong.””

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *